FIGURATIVE USE OF LANGUAGE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY

Vesna V.  Bulatović; Danijela M.  Prošić-Santovac; Tanja P.  Kaurin

doi:10.21618/fil2226131b

Authors

Vesna V. Bulatović University of Novi Sad Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Fundamental Sciences
Danijela M. Prošić-Santovac University of Novi Sad Faculty of Philosophy, Department of English Studies
Tanja P. Kaurin Union University, Faculty of Law and Business Studies Department of Security and Crime Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2226131b

Keywords:

conceptual metaphors, conceptualisation, computer, the Internet, mapping

Abstract

New technologies have pervaded many aspects of modern life and influenced human communication, emotions and language. This close interaction between people and computers is reflected in language, in the use of computing terms applied to human emotions, relationships and everyday activities. Metaphor plays an important role in the language of information technology and it is widely used in creating new vocabulary. This paper explores conceptual metaphors in order to determine their usage in the information technology research papers, through describing similarities and differences in the conceptualisation of these metaphors within two languages. The aim of the paper is to quantitatively and qualitatively present conceptual metaphors, regarding computers and the Internet, found in ten research papers written in English and in Serbian. These expressions are compared with respect to their frequency in the papers and the degree to which metaphorical vocabulary is present in analysed research papers. The results indicate that all authors have used conceptual metaphors, although papers in Serbian include a slightly larger number of expressions than papers in English. Apart from differences and diversities, the analysis also identifies a remarkably similar structure of the mapping in both languages.

References

Barry, John (1993), Technobabble, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Biber, Douglas (1988), Variation across speech and writing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Chatti, Sami (2020), “Seasonal metaphors in Arab journalistic discourse”, Metaphor and the Social World, 10, 1, 22–44.

Colburn, Timothy and Garry Shute (2008), “Metaphor in Computer Science”, Journal of Applied Logic, 6, 4, 526–533.

Constantine, Larry (2001), The peopleware papers, Yourdon Press, NJ.

Deignan, Alice (2005), Metaphor and corpus linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.

Đurović, Tatjana (2007), “Metaphors in Economic Discourse”, In: I. Lakić and N. Kostić (eds.), Language for Specific Purposes. Conference Proceedings, Institut za strane jezike, Podgorica, 43–55.

Gibbs, Raymond.W. (1999), “Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world”, Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected papers from 5the International Cognitive Linguistic Conference, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, 143–166.

Giles, Timothy. D. (2008), Motives for metaphor in scientific and technical communication, Baywood, Amityville.

Grevy, Carlo (1999), “Informationsmotorvejen og andre metaforer i computerfagsprog”, Hermes, 23, 173–201.

Pearson, Gwen (2013), ''Google Honors Grace Hopper... and a ''Bug'', https://www.wired.com/2013/12/googles-doodle-honors-grace-hopper-and-entomology/

Hyland, Ken (2006), English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book, Routledge, New York.

Johansson, Magnus (1997), Smart, Fast and Beautiful: on Rhetoric of Technology and Computing Discourse in Sweden 1995-1995, PhD thesis, University of Linköping, Linköping.

Johnson, Mark (1987), The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Kent, Michael (2001), “Managerial rhetoric as the metaphor for the World Wide Web”, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 18, 3, 359–375.

Klikovac, Duška (2004), Metafore u mišljenju i jeziku, XX vek, Beograd.

Koller, Veronika (2004), “Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘possessive, jealous and pugnacious?’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 1, 3–22.

Kövecses, Zoltán (2002), Metaphor. A Practical Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980), Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lazar, Michelle M. (2009), “Gender, War and Body Politics: a Critical Multimodal Analysis of Metaphor in Advertising”, In: Ahreens K. (ed), Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, 209–234.

Levine, Donald (1995), “The organism metaphor in sociology”, Social Research, 62, 2, 239–265.

Meyer, Ingrid, Victoria Amy Zaluski and Kristen Mackintosh (1997), “Metaphorical internet terms: a conceptual and structural analysis”, Terminology, 4, 1, 1–33.

Pulaczewska, Hanna (1999), Aspects of metaphor in physics, Max Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Radić-Bojanić, Biljana (2020), “Metaforičnost leksema iz leksičkog polja family na engleskom i porodica na srpskom jeziku”, Filolog, 22, 52–67.

Richardt, Susanne (2005), Metaphor in languages for specific purposes. The function of conceptual metaphor in written expert language and expert-lay communication in the domains of economics, medicine and computing, Petar Lang, Frankfurt.

Rohrer, Tim (1997), “Conceptual Blending on the Information Highway: How do metaphorical inferences work?”, Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 185–205), John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Semino, Elena (2008), Metaphor in discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Silaški, Nadežda (2009), “Kako delovati rečima – izbor leksike u reklamnim oglasima u časopisima za žene”, Teme, 33, 3, 925–938.

Silaški, Nadežda and Tatjana Đurović, (2019), “The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons”, Discourse, Context & Media, 31.

Smith, Michael (2007), “Levels of metaphor in persuasive legal writing”, Mercer Law Review, 58, 919–947.

Sweetser, Eve (1990), From etymology to pragmatics - Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

U. S. Department of Education (1997), “Parents Guide to the Internet”, Available on: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/parents/internet/index.html

Wellman, Barry and Milena Gulia (1999), “Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities”, Communities in cyberspace, Routledge, New York.

Wiggins, Richard (2000), “Al Gore and the Creation of the Internet”, First Monday, 5, 10, Available on: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/799/708

Wu, Jingfang and Rong Chen (2013), “Metaphors Ubiquitous in Computer and Internet Terminologies”, Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2, 10, 64–78.

Woodhams, Jay M. (2014). “‘We’re the nurses’: Metaphor in the discourse of workplace socialisation”, Language & Communication, 34, 56–68.

Zawisławska, Magdalena and Marta Falkowska (2021), “Metaphors in Polish, English, Russian, and French perfumery discourse”, Metaphor and the Social World, 11, 1, 143–170.

Zeng, Huiheng, Dennis Tay and Kathleen Ahrens (2020), “A multifactorial analysis of metaphors in political discourse”, Metaphor and the Social World, 10, 1, 141–168.

Analysed research papers

E1 – Rodrigues, Luis Filipe, Carlos. J. Costa (2016), “Gamification: A framework for designing software in e-banking”, Computers in Human Behavior, 62(C), 620–634.

E2 – Peris-Lopes, Pedro, Honorio Martin (2016), “Hardware Trojans against virtual keyboards on e-banking platforms – A proof of concept”, International Journal of Electronics and Communication, (AEU), 76, 146–151.

E3 – Tekchandani, Rajkumar, Rajesh Bhatia, Maninder Singh (2017), “Code clone genealogy detection on e-health system using Hadoop. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 61, 15–30.

E4 – Janković, Stanko, Biljana Stamatović (2017), “Automated classification of web application parts from a blackbox security testing perspective”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 86–89.

E5 – Tuponja, Boris, Goran Šuković (2017), “Applying Neat on the game 2048”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 261–264.

S1 – Mraković, Ivan (2017), “Kvalitativna i komparativna analiza Vodopadnog, Spiralnog i Scrum modela razvoja softvera”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 197–200.

S2 – Džakula, Branko (2017), “Visokotehnološki (sajber) kriminal i anatomija bezbjednosnih rizika u informaciono-komunikacionim sistemima”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 201–204.

S3 – Veličković, S. Zoran., Zoran N. Milivojević, Marko Z. Veličković (2017), “Insertovanje vodenog žiga skremblovanog GMSAT algoritmom u DWT-SVD domenu”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 221–224.

S4 – Čakić, Stevan., Aleksandar Popović (2017), “Alat Unity3D u konceptu proširene realnosti”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 249–252.

S5 – Šuh, T. Jelena, Snežana Lj. Stefanovski Pajović (2017), “Zaštita od DoS napada primenom Remotely Triggered Black Hole tehnike filtriranja saobraćaja”, In: Božo Krstajić (ed.), Informacione Tehnologije – sadašnjost i budućnost, Elektrotehnički fakultet Univerziteta Crne Gore, Podgorica, 277–280.