EXPLORING ASPECTUAL OPPOSITION IN RUSSIAN: A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF VIDET’ VS UVIDET’ AND SLYŠAT’ VS USLYŠAT’

Valentina  Noseda

doi:10.21618/fil2531132n

Authors

Valentina Noseda Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2531132n

Keywords:

corpus linguistics, Russian verbal aspect, aspectual opposition, aspectual competition, Aktionsart, videt.IPF-uvidet’.PF, slyšat’.IPF-uslyšat’

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of aspectual opposition in Russian through a corpus-based approach. Two pairs of verbs are examined: videt’.IPF-uvidet’. PF [to see] and slyšat’.IPF-uslyšat’.PF [to hear]. Data from the Russian-Italian Parallel corpus within the Russian National Corpus are statistically analyzed across four factors: context (narrative vs dialogic), object position, contiguous verb, and meaning. The aim is to identify the contexts in which the perfective forms are preferred over the imperfective counterparts. Since these verbs are atelic, the imperfective forms constitute the most natural way to express past actions, while the perfective adds an ingressive value. The analysis reveals that for both pairs, the presence of a contiguous verb and its aspect are the most significant factors influencing aspectual choice. However, for slyšat’.IPF-uslyšat’. PF, other factors also play a role, especially verb meaning. The paper further addresses the issue of determining whether these cases exemplify aspectual opposition or competition. While aspectual competition typically occurs with telic verbs where perfective and imperfective forms share identical meanings, the verb pairs under examination are argued to occupy a midpoint on a continuum between opposition and competition.

References

Bernasconi, B. (2022) Choice of Aspect in a Russian Modal Construction The case of приходиться/прийтись + infinitive. Poljarnyj Vestnik: Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies. 25 (2), 1–20.

Bernasconi, B. & Noseda, V. (2021) Examining the role of linguistic context in aspectual competition: a statistical study. Komp’juternaja lingvistika i intellektual’nye technologii. 20, 110–118.

Bertinetto, P. M. (1986) Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano: il Sistema dell’indicativo. Firenze, Accademia della Crusca.

Biagini, F., Maiko, T. & Noseda, V. (2024) Il corpus parallelo italiano-russo del Nacional’nyj Korpus russkogo jazyka (NKRJa). Evoluzione e applicazioni nelle ricerche della slavistica italiana. Studi Slavistici. XXI (1), 161–176.

Dickey, S. M. (2018) Thoughts on the ‘Typology of Slavic Aspect’. Russian Linguistics. 42, 69–103.

Dowty, D. R. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: the Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Company.

Eckhoff, H. M., Janda, L. A. & Lyashevskaya, O. (2017) Predicting Russian Aspect by Frequency across Genres. The Slavic and East European Journal. 61 (4), 844–875.

Garey, H. B. (1957) Verbal Aspect in French. Language. 33 (2), 91–110.

Gebert, L. (1991) Il sintagma verbale. La questione dell’aspetto. In Fici Giusti, F., Signorini, S. & Gebert, L. (eds.), La lingua russa. Storia, struttura, tipologia. Roma, La Nuova Italia Scientifica, pp. 237–292.

Gebert, L. (2014a) L’imperfettivo fattivo slavo e l’imperfetto narrativo romanzo: un confronto. In Inkova O., Di Filippo M. & Esvan F. (eds.), L’architettura del testo. Studi contrastivi slavo-romanzi. Alessandria, Edizioni dell’Orso, pp. 3–17.

Gebert, L. (2014b) Scelta aspettuale ‘oggettiva’ e ‘soggettiva’ e l’imperfettivo fattivo. In Bonola, A., Cotta Ramusino, P. & Goletiani L. (eds.), Studi italiani di linguistica slava. Strutture, uso e acquisizione. Firenze, Firenze University Press, pp. 319–331.

Gorbova, E. V. (2011) Vidovaja parnost’ russkogo glagola: Problemy i rešenija. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 4, 26–45.

Grønn, A. (2004) The semantics and pragmatics of the Russian Factual Imperfective (Doctoral thesis, University of Oslo), available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/76860

Israeli, A. (1996) Discourse analysis of Russian aspect: Accent on creativity. Journal of Slavic Linguistics. 4 (1), 8–49.

Israeli, A. (2001) The choice of aspect in Russian verbs of communication: Pragmatic contract. Journal of Slavic Linguistics. 9 (1), 49–98.

Janda, L. A. (2019) Quantitative Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 17 (1), 7–28.

Janda, L. A., Endresen, A. & Reynolds, R. J. (2019) Aspectual opposition and rivalry in Russian are not discrete: new evidence from experimental data. Russian linguistics. 43 (3), 249–271.

Janda, L. A. & Reynolds, R. J. (2019) Construal vs. redundancy: Russian aspect in context. Cognitive Linguistics. 30 (3), 467–497.

Klein, H. (1969) Das Verhalten der telischen Verben in den romanischen Sprachen erörtert an der Interferenz von Aspekt und Aktionsart, Doctoral Thesis, Philosophischen Fakultät der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.

Kopotev, M. V. (2021) O nekotorych sledstvijach korpusnoj lingvistiki dlja obščej teorii jazyka. Filologičeskij klass. 26 (2), 90–102.

Maiko, T. & Noseda, V. (In press) L’imperfettivo fattivo in russo e bielorusso: sei coppie di verbi telici a confronto. In Bažec, H. & Cergol, J. Dalle origini ai giorni nostri: Convergenze e divergenze tra lingue slave. Capodistria, University of Primorska Press.

Mehlig, H. (2001) Verbal aspect and the referential status of verbal predicates: On aspect usage in Russian who-questions. Journal of Slavic Linguistics. 9 (1), 99–235.

Noseda, V. (2018) La corpus revolution russa e il corpus parallelo italiano-russo: storia, criteri di compilazione e usi. L’Analisi linguistica e letteraria. XXIV (2), 115–132.

Noseda, V. (2022) La concorrenza degli aspetti nella lingua russa: Teoria, analisi, acquisizione. Alessandria, Edizioni dell’Orso.

Noseda, V. (2024) Pensare e vedere: una descrizione tempo-aspettuale in chiave contrastiva. In di Filippo, M., Inkova, O. & Macurová, P. (eds.), Architetture testuali. Simmetrie e asimmetrie a confronto. Napoli, UniorPress, pp. 59–80.

Padučeva, E. V. (1996) Semantičeskie issledovanija. Moskva, Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.

Padučeva, E. V. (2011) Otricanie. Materialy dlja proekta korpusnogo opisanija russkoj grammatiki. http://rusgram.ru

Plungjan, V. A. (2004) K diskursivnomu opisaniju aspektual’nych pokazatelej, in Volodin, V. P. (ed.), Tipologičeskie obosnovanija v grammatike. K 70-letiju professora V.S. Chrakovskogo. Moskva, Znak, 390–411.

Reynolds, R. (2016) Russian natural language processing for computer-assisted language learning: capturing the benefits of deep morphological analysis in real-life applications (Doctoral thesis, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10037/9685

Sičinava, D. V. (2005) Nacional’nyj korpus russkogo jazyka: očerk predystorii, in Nacional’nyj korpus russkogo jazyka: 2003-2005. Moskva, Indrik, 21–30.

Sičinava, D. V. (2013) Nesoveršennyj vid. Materialy dlja proekta korpusnogo opisanija russkoj grammatiki, available at: http://rusgram.ru

Strobl, C., Malley, J. & Tutz, G. (2009) An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests. Psychological methods. 14, 323–348.

Vendler, Z. (1957) Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review. 66 (2), 143–160.

Zaliznjak, A. A. & Šmelev, A. D. (2000). Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moskva, Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.

Zaliznjak, A. A., Mikaėljan I. L. & Šmelev, A. D. (2010). Vidovaja korreljativnost’ v russkom jazyke: v zaščitu vidovoj pary. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2010 (1), 3–23.