Traditional Gender Roles in Serbian and Spanish Proverbs on Marriage

Authors

  • Ivana Georgijev University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Romance Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2021079g

Keywords:

Serbian proverbs, Spanish proverbs, sociolinguistics, patriarchal cultural model, marriage

Abstract

The focus of this paper is a comparative sociolinguistic analysis of Serbian and Spanish proverbs on marriage. Proverbs have been analysed bearing in mind that they reflect the social and cultural background of people who use them (or did so in the past), containing information on the ways of thinking and behaving in a certain community. Both Serbian and Spanish societies and cultures historically belong to the patriarchal cultural model based on a hierarchical male-female social organisation. In order to find out how this patriarchal cultural model is reflected in Serbian and Spanish proverbs, we have selected and analysed those proverbs that show desirable qualities and virtues women should possess (or had to in the past) in order to get married, as well as the roles of male family members in choosing an adequate wife or husband for their children. The analysis indicates women were restricted to a private domain and supposed to stay at home and take care of their family. They had to be hardworking, generous and obedient if looking for a husband. They also had to offer a dowry. Both Serbian and Spanish proverbs, being created and used in the past, illustrate the social background of these communities and confirm dominant male social roles and subordinated male-dependent female roles. This paper is written with the aim of raising an awareness of a cultural and linguistic heritage in prov-erbs and sayings because these examples of popular wisdom on marriage are a way of legitimising and maintaining the hierarchy of power when it comes to gender roles.

References

Izvori

Bergua, José (1984), Refranero español, Madrid: Clásicos Bergua.

Canellada, María Josefa, Berta Pallares (2006), Refranero espanol: Refranes, clasificacion, significado y uso, Madrid: Editorial Castalia.

Correas, Gonzalo (2000 [1627]), Vocabulario de refranes y frases proverbiales, Madrid: Editorial Castalia.

Junceda, Luis (2006), Diccionario de refranes, dichos y proverbios, Madrid: Espasa.

Kleut, Marija (2010), Jednostavni oblici narodne književnosti, Novi Sad: Izdavački centar Matice srpske.

Refranero multilingüe. https://cvc.cervantes.es/lengua/refranero/

Stefanović Karadžić, Vuk (1969), Srpske narodne poslovice i druge različne kao one u običaj uzete riječi, Beograd: Nolit.

Šaulić, Anica (1962), Antologija narodnih poslovica i zagonetki, Beograd: Narodna knjiga.

Šćepanović, Mihailo (2005), Vukove srpske narodne poslovice s registrom ključnih reči (2. izdanje), Beograd: Jasen.

Vlajinac, Milan Z. (1975), Žena u narodnim poslovicama (ur. Dušan Nedeljković), Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.

Literatura

Bandić, Dušan (1991), Narodna religija Srba u 100 pojmova, Beograd: Nolit.

Deretić, Jovan (1990), Kratka istorija srpske književnosti, Beograd: BIGZ.

Domínguez Barajas, Elías (2010), The Function of Proverbs in Discourse: The Case of a Mexican Transnational Social Network, Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter GmbH&Co.

Ferry, Luc (2013), On Love: A Philosophy for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Filipović, Jelena (2013), ”Perspectivas de género en el discurso escolar y educativo en España y en Serbia”, Colindancias, 4, 225–234.

Fotić, Aleksandar (priredio) (2005), Privatni život u srpskim zemljama u osvit modernog doba, Beograd: Clio.

Giddens, Anthony (1992), The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Ibáñez Moreno, Ana (2005), ”An Analysis of the Cognitive Dimension of Proverbs in English andSpanish: the Conceptual Power of Language Reflecting Popular Believes”, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, II, 1, 42–54.

Illouz, Eva (1997), Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Kamen, Henry (2005), Golden Age Spain (second ed.), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kleut, Marija (2010), Jednostavni oblici narodne književnosti, Novi Sad: Izdavački centar Matice srpske.

Kovačević, Ivan (2001), Istorija srpske etnologije I, Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar.

Marković, Radul (1985), Bokori: narodne poslovice na tlu Srbije: pogledi na život, društvo i ljudske vrednosti: literarno-teorijski i metodičko-nastavni aspekti, Gornji Milanovac: Kulturni centar.

Mieder, Wolfgang (2004), Proverbs. A Handbook, London: Greenwood Press.

Milić, Andjelka (2007), Sociologija porodice: kritika i izazovi, Beograd: Čigoja štampa.

Pavićević, Aleksandra (2007), „Bračni i porodični život: društvena politika i procesi transformacije”, Privatni život kod Srba u dvadesetom veku (ur. M. Ristović), Beograd: Clio, 59–100.

Pejović, Andjelka (2014), „Paremije kao deo etnolingvističkog nasleđa”, Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 62/2, 201–214.

Pešić, Mihailo, Jovan Bazić (2008), Sociologija (3. izd.), Beograd: Univerzitet Singidunum.

Šaulić, Anica (1962), Antologija narodnih poslovica i zagonetki, Beograd: Narodna knjiga.

Timotijević, Miroslav (2005), „Privatnost porodice”, Privatni život u srpskim zemljama

u osvit modernog doba (priredio A. Fotić), Beograd: Clio, 759–811.

Timotijević, Miroslav (2011), „U osvit novog doba”, Istorija privatnog života u Srba: od srednjeg veka do savremenog doba (ured. Popović, M., Timotijević M., Ristović, M.), Beograd: Clio.

Zurdo Ruiz-Ayúcar, María Teresa, Rosa Piñel, Jesús Cantera, Julia Sevilla, M.ª Teresa Barbadillo, Agnieszka Matyasczyk, Fernando Presa (2001), ”El amor en el refranero de cinco lenguas europeas (Alemán, Español, Francés, Italiano y Polaco)”, Revista de Filología Alemana, 9, 145–163.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Georgijev, I. (2020). Traditional Gender Roles in Serbian and Spanish Proverbs on Marriage. PHILOLOGIST – Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies, 11(21), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2021079g