SHAKESPEARE AND INTERMEDIALITY IN THE TELEVISION SERIES SLINGS AND ARROWS

Authors

  • Ana Andrejević University of Priština in Kosovska Mitrovica Faculty of Philosophy, Department of English Language and Literature

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2429453a

Keywords:

Shakespeare, drama, theatre, intermediality, remediation, transmediality, Slings and Arrows, television

Abstract

Shakespeare’s works have historically been associated with elite culture, yet their adaptation and integration into popular culture remain pertinent. His narratives hold such significance in global culture that they spontaneously generate numerous adaptations and sequels through the ‘snowball effect’, as defined by Ryan, both within the same medium and across different media. In the initial stages of adapting Shakespeare’s plays, the adaptations were intermedial. However, starting from the Romantic era, they also underwent reshaping in other media, utilising remediation for the purposes of modernisation and contextualisation. In today’s electronic and new media era, Shakespeare’s plays undergo a transformation across diverse media platforms, where familiar contents are transposed in various ways. Many intermedial and transmedial adaptations borrow recognisable topoi, characters, or plots, creating new narratives that often lack artistic depth. Conversely, the Canadian television series Slings and Arrows distinguishes itself by emphasising the enduring artistic value of Shakespeare’s narrative across every medium. Spanning three seasons, the series portrays the challenges of a fictional theatre company as it prepares to produce three of Shakespeare’s plays: Hamlet, Macbeth, and King Lear. Within this context, we witness the process of remediation, which involves the integration of one media form into another. By presenting the fundamental characteristics of theatre and highlighting its artistic nature, the series Slings and Arrows becomes both an instructive and entertaining media format. This paper aims to explain the method and level of success of the remediation process within the context of Shakespeare’s authentic narrative. The research method draws upon Bolter and Grusin’s theory of remediation in conjunction with Ryan’s and Jenkins’ concepts of intermediality and transmediality.

References

Andrejević, А. (2015) Kulturološki fenomeni sna (Hipnos) i smrti (Tanatos) u tragediji Magbet. Susreti naroda i kultura – zbornik naučnih radova. Kosovska Mitrovica, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Prištini, pp. 197‒211.

Baetens, J. & Martínez, D. S. M. (2015) Literature in the Expanded Field: Intermediality at the Crossroads of Literary Theory and Comparative literature. Interfaces. 36, pp. 289–304. https://doi.org/10.4000/interfaces.245

Bickley, P. & Stevens, J. (2021) Studying Shakespeare Adaptation From Restoration Theatre to YouTube. London, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (2000) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

Brook, P. (1996) The Empty Space. New York, First Touchstone Edition.

Edgerton, G. R. & Jones, J. P. (Eds.) (2008) The Essential HBO Reader. Kentucky, University Press of Kentucky.

Fischlin, D. (Ed.) (2014) OuterSpeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York, New York University Press.

Klett, E. (2012) Shakespearean Authority and Emotional Realism in Slings and Arrows. Early Modern Studies Journal. 5, pp. 1–21. https://earlymodernstudiesjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/1.-klett-EMJS-vol-12.pdf

Kulić, D. (2019) Dramske tehnike u nastavi stranog jezika. Kosovska Mitrovica, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Prištini.

Makaryk, I. R. & Prince, K. (Eds.) (2017) Shakespeare and Canada: Remembrance of Ourselves. Ottawa, University of Ottawa Press.

Malcolm, G. & Marshall, K. (Еds.) (2012) Locating Shakespeare in the Twenty–First Century. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Mihajlović, J. (2019) Problemski pristup nastavi gramatike u osnovnoj školi. Kosovska Mitrovica, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Prištini.

Mojsi, D. (2016) Geopolitika televizijskih serija. Beograd, Clio.

Osborne, L. E. (2011) Serial Shakespeare: Intermedial Performance and the Outrageous Fortunes of Slings & Arrows. Borrowers and Lenders. 6 (2), pp. 1–24.

Petković, V. (2020) Književno delo Dušana Radovića u svetlu teorije transmedijalnosti. Niš, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu. Neobjavljena doktorska disertacija: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/18558/Doctoral_thesis_11466.pdf ?sequence=1

Ryan, M. L. (Ed.) (2004) Narrative across Media: the Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.

Ryan, M. L., Emerson, L. & and Robertson, B. J. (Eds.) (2014) The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Rajewsky, I. O. (2005) Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality. Intermédialités/Intermediality. 6, pp. 43–64. https://doi.org/10.7202/1005505ar

Rippl, G. (Еd.) (2015) Handbook of Intermediality. Berlin–Boston, Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

Slings & Arrows (2003–2006) Rhombus/Acorn Media. Directed by Peter Wellington, written by Susan Coyne, Bob Martin, and Mark McKinney, performances by Paul Gross, Martha Burns, Stephen Ouimette, and Mark McKinney.

Wareh, P. (2015) Base Respects of Thrift: Hamlet and Slings & Arrows. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies. 17 (2), pp. 264–288. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/intelitestud.17.2.0264

Winckler, R. & Huertas-Martín, V. (Eds.) (2021) Television Series as Literature. Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan.

Šekspir, V. (1966a) Hamlet. Beograd, Kultura.

Šekspir, V. (1966b) Kralj Lir. Beograd, Kultura.

Šekspir, V. (1966c) Magbet. Beograd, Kultura.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Andrejević А. (2024). SHAKESPEARE AND INTERMEDIALITY IN THE TELEVISION SERIES SLINGS AND ARROWS. PHILOLOGIST – Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies, 15(29), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2429453a