• Petra V. Mitić University of Niš Faculty of Philosophy




feminist theory, reductionist models of identity, dichotomous thinking, constructionism/essentialism debate, (radical) humanism


In its attempts to defend the right of women to claim their own subjectivity, as well as the equal right to participate in the social system institutions, the mainstream of feminist thinking has been marked crucially by the question of woman and her identity. Tis question could be said to occupy a central place in feminist texts and discussions which started even before the women’s movement was officially created. But since feminist disagreements about how these issues should be approached appropriately have already resulted in serious misunderstandings and mutually severe accusations, this paper aims at shedding light at the very nature of these polarities. In doing so, the focus has been placed on how the terms equal and different have been theorised. These dissenting voices have certainly proved productive in the context of theory itself, but have done much harm in the domain of social activism which failed to initiate truly substantial changes within western society and culture. The same countereffect is also visible in theory, which has generated a diversity of feminisms, but has definitely failed to offer a comprehensive critique of the perniciously repressive culture. The lack of gender equality has always been an important dimension of this culture, but still just a segment and one particular mechanism of the invisible matrix which has never actually stopped producing binary hierarchies. They are being manifested in different forms today but have retained fundamentally unchanged and unchallenged structures, promoting an ideologically induced perception of reality to appear natural and self-evident. The paper puts forward the claim that a humanistic and anti-capitalist feminism is a framework broad enough to overcome all exclusions and one-sided definitions and to head towards one such comprehensive feminism – bringing us back to the original radicalism of the women’s movement. To do so, it is necessary to reconsider the general confusion within postmodernist discourse, and especially the controversy related to what humanism should stand for today.


Alcoff, Linda (1997), „Cultural Feminism versus Post-structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory”, in: Linda Nicholson, The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory. Routledge.

Bahovec, D. Eva (2007), „Feminizam i ambivalentnost: Simon de Bovoar”. Beograd: Genero, elektronsko izdanje br. 1.

Butler, Judith (2009), Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?, London, New York: Verso.

Changfoot, Nadine (2009), „The Second Sex’s Continued Relevance for Equality and Difference Feminisms”, European Journal of Women’s Studies, Vol. 16, Issue 1.

De Bovoar, Simon (1982), Drugi Pol I, II, BIGZ.

Echols, Alice (1983), „The New Feminism of Yin and Yang”, u: Ann Snitow (et al.), Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, New York: Monthly Review Press.

Eisenstein, Hester (2009), Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World, Routledge.

Fraser, Nancy (2013), „How feminism became capitalism’s handmaiden – and how to reclaim it”. (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminismcapitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal).

Gros, Elizabet (2002), „Preoblikovanje tela”, sa engleskog prevela Tatjana Popović, Beograd: Ženske studije 14/15.

Hekman, J. Susan (2004), Private Selves, Public Identities: Reconsidering Identity Politics, The Pennsylvania State University Press.

huks, bell (2006), Feministička teorija: od margine ka centru, prevela Milica Minić, Beograd: Feministička 94.

Irigaray, Luce (1985), „The Power of Discourse and the Subordination of the Feminine”, This Sex Which Is Not One, Cornell University Press.

Johnson, Pauline (1994), Feminism as Radical Humanism, Westview Press / Routledge 2019.

Johnson, Pauline (2015), „Feminism and Humanism”, in: Andrew Copson and A. C. Grayling (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Humanism, Wiley Blackwell.

Lloyd, Moya (2005), Beyond Identity Politics: Feminism, Power & Politics, Sage Publications Ltd.

McClintock, Anne (1995), Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest, Routledge.

Moi, Toi (2001), What is a Woman? And Other Essays, Oxford University Press, 1st pub. 1999.

Moi, Toi (2008), Simone de Beauvoir: the Making of an Intellectual Woman, Oxford University Press, 1st edition 1994.

Petrović, Lena (2000), „Whom Do You Ser ve with This ?: Teaching the Politics of Postmodernism”, Facta Universitatis, Vol. 2, No. 7, 107-120.

Snitou, En (1996), „Dnevnik o rodu”, Beograd: Ženske studije 5/6.

Snitow, Ann (1991), „A Gender diary”, u: Marianne Hirsch and Evelyn Fox Keller (eds.), Conflicts in Feminism, Routledge.

Toševski, Jovo (2004), Skrivena seksualnost: o morfopsihološkom dejstvu ženske seksualnosi na muškarca i vrstu u celini, Beograd: Beoknjiga.

Whelehan, Imelda (1995), Modern Feminist Thought: From the Second Wave to „PostFeminism”, Edinburgh University Press.

Zerilli, M. G., Linda (1992), „A Process Without a Subject: Simone de Beauvoir and Julia Kristeva on maternity”, Signs, Vol. 18, No. 1.




How to Cite

V. Mitić, P. (2020). EQUAL AND DIFFERENT: FEMINISM AS RADICAL HUMANISM . PHILOLOGIST – Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies, 11(22), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2022374m