THE ANALYTICAL APPROACH IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING: THE EXAMPLE OF HEADWAY COURSEBOOKS

Authors

  • Petra Mitić University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Centre for Foreign Languages

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2021055m

Keywords:

Analytical learning, metalinguistic competence, contrastive approach, communicative model, the analysis of Headway coursebooks

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the communicative approach in learning a foreign language including the problems that followed the empirical ap-pliciation of this approach, especially in the domain of learning English as a foreign language, as well as the attempts to identify and overcome its limitations. The analytical aspect of learning has been given the central at-tention here, which is why the theoretical review is followed by considering the justification and necessity of its inlusion using the Headway coursebooks as an example. The analysis has covered three particular levels of learning mirrored in the titles: Headway Intermediate, Headway Upper-intermediate and Headway Advanced, which corresponds with the standardised levels from B1 to C1 in Europe. Our discussion is concentrated primarily on teaching English as a second language at the university level, so the analytical approach is looked upon mainly in the context of teaching students at differ-ent departments of philology. But the implications of using this model reach much further than university teaching as Headway coursebooks have been used both in private and state schools throughout Serbia, as well as around the world. A very consistent insistence on using the analytical approach is a special characteristic of these coursebooks and certainly something that sets them apart from many other similar coursebooks available on the market. The pedagogical and methodological aspects of this approach are such that leave space to the teacher to make use of the advantages of occasional con-trastive analysis with the two languages – English and the native language of the student (and/or the first foreign language) – drawing attention to those areas of English which have proved most difficult regardless of what particular native language the student speaks. This is why the analytical approach has shown to be of such crucial importance as well as encouraging the student to see that acquiring language skills is neccesarily related to how well he understands the inner logic and mechanisms of the language itself. Last but not least, it gives the student a possibility to see learning as a meaningful process – one in which this competence has proved to be a neccesary and an extremely significant aspect. 

References

Anthony, M. Edward (1963), ''Approach, method and technique'', English Language Teaching 17, 63–67.

Bachman, F. Lyle (1990), Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing, Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.

Bagarić, Vesna, Jelena Mihaljević Đigunović (2007), ''Defining Communicative Competence'', Metodika, Sveučilište u Zagrebu: Filozofski fakultet, Vol. 8, br. 1, 94–103.

Broughton, Geoffrey, Christopher Brumfit, Roger Flavell, Peter Hill and Anita Pincas (2003), Teaching English as a Foreign Language, (2nd edition) London and New York: Routledge.

Brown, H. Douglas (2002), Teaching by principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, New Jersey: Longman (1st edition, 1994).

Canale, Michael, Merrill Swain (1980), ''Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing'', Applied Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Vol.1, 1–47.

Canale, Michael (1983), ''From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy''. In Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication, 2–27. London: Longman.

Ellis, Rod (2002), ''Grammar Teaching – Practice or Consciousness Raising?''. In Jack C. Richards and Willy A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, C. Jack, Theodore S. Rodgers (2001), Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd edition.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, C. Jack, Willy A. Renandya (2002) (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, J. Sandra (1972), Communicative Competence: An Experiment in Foreign Language Teaching, Philadelphia: The Centre for Curriculum Development, Inc.

Soars, Liz, John Soars (2009), New Headway Intermediate (1st pub. 2003), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Soars, Liz, John Soars (2009), New Headway Upper-Intermediate (1st pub. 2005), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Soars, Liz, John Soars (2009), New Headway Advanced (1st pub. 2003), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swan, Michael (2002), ''Seven Bad Reasons for Teaching Grammar – and Two Good Ones''. In Jack C. Richards and Willy A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, S. David (1988), ''The meaning and use of the term competence in linguistics and applied linguistics'', Applied Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Vol. 9, 148–169.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Mitić, P. (2020). THE ANALYTICAL APPROACH IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING: THE EXAMPLE OF HEADWAY COURSEBOOKS. PHILOLOGIST – Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies, 11(21), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2021055m