ELLIPSIS IN COMPARATIVES IN ENGLISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2124083vSchlagworte:
ellipsis, comparatives, deletion, gapping, stranding, generative grammarAbstract
This paper presents an analysis of certain properties of ellipsis within comparative clauses in English. The analysis has shown that the comparative clauses contain gradable expressions and establish a connection between two-stage concepts related to gradable properties. In other words, what is claimed in the matrix clause is compared to claims from subordinated clauses, so that the corresponding linguistic structures are usually omitted in a comparative clause. An elliptical comparative clause usually consists only of an expanded complement introduced with than, like, as ... as. The omitted parts, most often phrases, parts of predicates (or the whole predication) and clauses, are present in the text as antecedents. We have not limited our research only to the syntactic and / or semantic level in the reconstruction of ellipted content, but to all contexts and situations from which recoverability is possible, regardless of the type of ellipsis. We have examined the conditions and constraints of ellipsis within comparative clauses in the theoretical part, and the properties of the comparative ellipsis in the analysis on the corpus of contemporary English.
Literaturhinweise
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan (1999), The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, London: Longman.
Vukojević, Luka (1996), „Strukturno-semantički status poredbenih rečenica“, Filologija, 27, Zagreb, 123–151, UDK 808.62-056.
Gawron, Jean Mark (1992), „Focus and Ellipsis in Comparatives and Superlatives: A Case Study“, Salt proceedings, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v2i0.3031.
Greenbaum, Sidney, Randolph, Quirk (1990), A Student’s Grammar of the English language, London: Longman.
Jacobs, A. Roderick, & Peter S. Rosenbaum (1968), English Transformational Grammar, Blaisdell Publishing Company.
Johnson, Kyle (1997), When Verb Phrases Go Missing. GLOT 2.5: 3–9.
Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Merchant (1997), Attributive Comparatives and Bound Ellipsis. LRC-97-03, Santa Cruz: University of California.
Kovačević, Miloš (2000), Stilistika i gramatika stilskih fgura, Kragujevac: „Kantakuzin“.
Kovačević, Miloš (2003), Gramatičke i stilističke teme, Banja Luka: Književna zadruga.
Kristal, Dejvid (1985), Enciklopedijski rečnik moderne lingvistike, Beograd: Nolit.
Kristal, Dejvid (1987), Kembrička enciklopedija jezika, Beograd: Nolit.
Lasnik, Howard (1995), A Note on Pseudogapping. In Papers on Minimalist Syntax; Rob Pensalfni and Hiroyuki Ura (eds.). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWIPL.
Lechner, Winfried (2004), Ellipsis in Comparatives, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Masnikosa, Irina (2019), Analiza i procesiranje elipse glagolske skupine u hrvatskome jeziku, Zagreb: Sveučilište u Zagrebu (doktorska disertacija).
Merchant, Jason (2001), The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis, New York: Oxford University Press.
Moltmann, Friederike (1992), „The empty element in comparatives“, The Proceedings of NELS, 319–333.
McShane, Marjorie (2005), A Theory of Ellipsis, New York: Oxford University Press.
Napoli, Donna Jo (1983), „Comparative Ellipsis: A Phrase Structure Analysis“, Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 14, No. 4, Massachusetts: Te MIT Press, pp. 675–694.
Piper, Predrag, Ivan Klajn (2015), Normativna gramatika srpskog jezika, Novi Sad: Matica srpska.
Pulman, Stephen (1991), Comparatives and ellipsis, Cambridge: University of CCL.
Radojević, Danijela (2016), Sintaksičko-stilske karakteristike eliptičnih rečenica u književnoumjetničkim tekstovima, Zagreb: Rasprave, 42/2, str. 587–598, UDK 81’367.334:82.
Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May (1994), Indices and Identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Huddleston, Rodney, & Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hudeček, Lana, i Milica Mihaljević (2019), „Podjela i nazivlje zavisnosloženih rečenica u novijim hrvatskim gramatikama“, Zagreb: Rasprave 45/2, str. 437–471. https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.45.2.11
Chomsky, Noam (1977), „On wh movement“. In P. Culicover et al. (eds.): Formal Syntax, New York: Academic Press.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2021 PHILOLOGIST-JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND CULTURE
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.