Vašar taštine i Lomača taština: prolegomena za poetiku modernog realizma

Stefan S.  Alidini

doi:10.21618/fil2021415a

Auteurs

Stefan S. Alidini Универзитет у Београду, Филолошки факултет

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2021415a

Mots-clés :

realizam, neorealizam, intertekstualnost, fikcija, fakcija, novo novinarstvo

Résumé

Rad se bavi ispitivanjem intertekstualnih i poetičkih veza Tekerijevog (Thackeray) romana Vašar taštine (Vanity Fair) i romana Lomača taština (Bonfire of the Vanities) Toma Vulfa (Tom Wolfe). Polazeći od problema intertekstualnih teorija, analiza se odvija prema sistematizaciji Žerara Ženeta (Genette). Rasvetljavaju se mogući odnosi između dva romana koji se ispituju na samim tekstovima, a potom pronalaze i u Vulfovoj eksplicitnoj poetici. Prate se intertekstualne veze naslova, serijalizovane forme oba romana i razmatra njihov uticaj na strukturu dela. Potom se razmatraju različiti aspekti mikrostruktura oba romana (elementi zapleta, pripovedne tehnike) i eksplicira smisao Vulfovih adaptacija Tekerijevog modela. Konačno, opažene odlike stavljaju se u kontekst Vulfove eksplicitne poetike i stanovišta obnove realističkog romana, gde se roman Lomača taština ostvaruje kao jedan od utemeljujućih tekstova neorealizma.

Références

Izvori

Tekeri, Vilijam (1963), Svetski vašar I, Jelisaveta Marković (prev.), Beograd: Branko Đonović.

Tekeri, Vilijam (1963), Svetski vašar II, Jelisaveta Marković (prev.), Beograd: Branko Đonović.

Wolfe, Tom (1988), The Bonfire of the Vanities, New York: Bantam Books.

Literatura

Abrams, Mayer Howard (2008), A Glossary of Literary Terms, 9th edition, Boston: Wadsworth.

Allen, Graham (2000), Intertextuality, London: Routlege.

Baker, Joseph (1955), ”Vanity Fair and The Celestial City”, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 10(2), pp. 89–98.

Bloom, Harold (2001), ”Introduction”, in Bloom, H. (ed.) Modern Critical Views: Tom Wolfe, Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, pp. 1–5

Claviez, Thomas (2004), ”Introduction: Neo-Realism and How to ‘Make It New’”, Amerikastudien / American Studies, 49(1), Neorealism – Between Innovation and Continuation, pp. 5–18.

Cole, Sarah Rose (2006), ”The Aristocrat in the Mirror: Male Vanity and Bourgeois Desire in William Makepeace Thackeray’s Vanity Fair”, Nineteenth-Century Literature, 61(2), pp. 137–170.

Dooley, D.J. (1971), ”Thackeray’s Use of Vanity Fair”, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900: Nineteenth Century, 11(4), pp. 701–713.

Duff, David (2002), ”Intertextuality versus Genre Theory: Bakhtin, Kristeva and the Question of Genre”, Paragraph, vol. 25, no. 1, March, pp. 54–73.

Farrell, Joseph (2005), ”Intention and Intertext”, Phoenix, 59(1/2), pp. 98–111.

Fraser, Russel (1957), ”Pernicious Casuistry: A Study of Character in Vanity Fair”, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 12(2), pp. 137–147.

Genette, Gérard (1997), Palimpsests, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Harden, Edgar (1967), ”The Discipline and Significance of Form in Vanity Fair”, PMLA, 82(7), pp. 530–541.

Lester Jr., John A. (1954), ”Thackeray’s Narrative Technique”, PMLA, 69(3), pp. 392–409.

Leypoldt, Günter (2004), ”Recent Realist Fiction and the Idea of Writing ‘After Postmodernism’”, Amerikastudien / American Studies, 49(1), Neorealism – Between Innovation and Continuation, pp. 19–34.

Lund, Michael (1993), ”The Nineteenth-Century Periodical Novel Continued:

Bonfire of the Vanities in Rolling Stone”, American Periodicals, vol. 3, pp. 51–61.

Masters, Joshua (1999), ”Race and the Infernal City in Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities”, Journal of Narrative Theory, 39(2), pp. 208–227.

Posner, Richard (1989), ”The Depiction of Law in The Bonfire of the Vanities”, The Yale Law Journal, 98(8), pp. 1653–1661.

Rusinko, Elaine (1979), ”Intertextuality: The Soviet Approach to Subtext”, Dispositio, 4(11/12), pp. 213–235.

Smith, James (2001), ”Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities: A Dreiser Novel for the 1980’s”, in Bloom, H. (ed.) Modern Critical Views: Tom Wolfe, Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, pp. 135–150.

Sutherland, J.A. (1973), ”The Expanding Narrative of Vanity Fair”, The Journal of Narrative Technique, 3(3), pp. 149–169.

Taube, Myron (1963), ”Contrast as a Principle of Structure in Vanity Fair”, Nineteenth- Century Fiction, 18(2), pp. 119–135.

Torjusen, Henrik (2015), ”Wealth and Virtue: Utopian Republicanism in Tom Wolfe’s

The Bonfire of the Vanities”, American Studies in Scandinavia, 47(1), pp. 22–39.

Wilkenfeld, Roger (1971), ”Before the Curtain and Vanity Fair”, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 26(3), pp. 307–318.

Wilkinson, Ann (1965), ”The Tomeavesian Way of Knowing the World: Technique and Meaning in Vanity Fair”, ELH, 32(3), pp. 370–387.

Wolfe, Tom (1972), ”Why Aren’t They Writing the Great American Novel Anymore: A Treatise on the Varieties of Realistic Experience”, Esquire, December, Available from: https://www.esquire.com/lifestyle/money/a20703846/tom-wolfe-new-jounalism- american-novel-essay/ [Accessed: 29.03.2019.].

Wolfe, Tom (2001), ”Stalking the Billion-Footed Beast: A Literary Manifesto for the New Social Novel”, in Bloom, H. (ed.) Modern Critical Views: Tom Wolfe, Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishing, pp. 151–168.

Wolff, Cynthia (1974), ”Who Is the Narrator of Vanity Fair and Where Is He Standing?”, College Literature, 1(3), pp. 190–203.