SOME ASPECTS OF IMPROVING ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEXTBOOKS FOR GEOLOGISTS AT THE UNIVERSITY LEVEL: CLIL VS. ESP

Lidija V.  Beko; Dragoslava N.  Mićović

doi:10.21618/fil2327317b

Autori

Lidija V. Beko Univerzitet u Beogradu Rudarsko-geološki fakultet
Dragoslava N. Mićović Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet u Beogradu Departman kriminalistike

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2327317b

Ključne reči:

CLIL, ESP, udžbenik, autentičnost, vizuelne vrednosti, skafolding, jezičke aktivnosti

Apstrakt

Imajući u vidu ogroman značaj koji nastavni materijali imaju u jezičkoj učionici, rad se bavi analizom savremenih pristupa izradi udžbenika stranog jezika na univerzitetskom nivou. S obzirom na uticaj engleskog jezika kao svetskog jezika na kome se objavljuju gotovo sva najnovija istraživanja i dostignuća iz oblasti tehničkih nauka, pa i geologije, i ovaj primer udžbenika zasnovan je na engleskom kao zajedničkom jeziku najvećeg broja govornika. Smatramo, međutim, da on može biti preveden na druge jezike i time dati priliku da studenti uče istu oblast na dva ili više jezika, sa manjim kognitivnim opterećenjem, a povećanim uspehom. Takođe, od velike je važnosti da udžbenik ili jezički udžbenici prolaze kroz takva akademska i praktična podešavanja koja će suštinske nedostatke tradicionalne nastave zameniti korisnim i primenjivim obrazovnim modelima. Prateći takve ciljeve, rad pokušava da: 1) predstavi značaj razvoja nastavnih materijala putem principa vizuelnih vrednosti, autentičnosti i skafoldinga, 2) razjasni i rasvetli suštinske nedostatke tradicionalnih nastavnih materija poređenjem ESP i CLIL metode, 3) predstavi praktične predloge vežbanja i usvajanja jezika putem tri aktivnosti prilagođene navedenim principima.

Reference

Alexander, R. (2008) Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. Dialogos UK, 4th Revised edition.

Alexander, R. (2018) Developing dialogue: genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education. 33 (5), 361–398. https://www.robinalexander.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RPIE-2018-Alexander-dialogic-teaching.pdf [Accessed 20th April 2022].

Bernard, R. & Zemach, D. (2003) Materials for Specific Purposes. In: Tomlinson, B. (ed.) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Continuum London, pp. 306–323.

Budiman, P. G., Sada, C. & Wardah, W. (2018) Improving students’ vocabulary by using comic strips in teaching narrative text. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa. 7 (9), 1–8. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/28279/75676578327 [Accessed 20th April 2022].

Da Silva, A. B., Santos, G. S. D. & De Araújo Bispo, A. C. K. (2017) The comics as teaching strategy in learning of students in an undergraduate management program. RAM. Revista De Administração Mackenzie. 18 (1), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712017/administracao.v18n1p40-65 [Accessed 5h May 2022].

Del Pozo, M. & Estébanez, D. R. (2015) Textbooks for Content and Language Integrated Learning: policy, market and appropriate didactics? Foro De Educación. 13 (18), 123–141. DOI: 10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.007.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (2010) Developments in English for Specific Purposes: a Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Edmondson, W. (2009) Language Awareness. In: Knapp, K., Seidlhofer, B. & Widdowson, H. G. (eds) Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning. London, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163–190.

Hopwood, V. & Gallaway, C. (1999) Evaluating the linguistic experience of a deaf child in a mainstream class: a case study. Deafness & Education International. 1 (3), 172–187. DOI: 10.1002/dei.61.

Knouzi, I., Swain, M., Lapkin, S. & Brooks, L. A. (2010) Self-scaffolding mediated by languaging: microgenetic analysis of high and low performers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 20 (1), 23–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00227.x.

Kohonen, V. (2009) Autonomy, Authenticity and Agency in Language Education: The European Language Portfolio as a Pedagogical Resource. In: Kantelinen, R. & Pollari, P. (eds.) Language Education and Lifelong Learning. Joensuu, University of Eastern Finland, pp. 9–44.

Krashen, S. D. (1991) The Input Hypothesis: An Update. In: Alatis, J. E. (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991. Washington, D. C., Georgetown University Press, pp. 409–431.

Laufer, B., Meara, P., & Nation, P. (2005) Ten best ideas for teaching vocabulary. The Language Teacher. 29 (7), 11–14. http://jalt-publications.org/tlt/issues/2005-07_29.7 [Accessed 20th April 2022].

Nation, I. S. P. (2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (2011) Teaching and researching language learning strategies. London, Longman.

Poai, S. T. (2018) Teaching English vocabulary using comic strips. Sintuwu Maroso Journal of English Teaching (JET). 4 (1), 51–58. https://ojs.unsimar.ac.id/index.php/sintuwumarosoJET/article/download/153/138 [Accessed 20th April 2022].

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S. & Barch J. (2004) Enhancing Students’ Engagement by Increasing Teachers’ Autonomy Support. Motivation and Emotion. 28 (2), 147–169. DOI: 10.1023/b:moem.0000032312.95499.6f.

Rengur, Z. & Sugirin, S. (2019) The Effectiveness of using Comic Strips to Increase Students’ Reading Comprehension for the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Pundong. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2018), August 30–31, 2018, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Atlantis Press, pp. 239–243. DOI: 10.2991/iceri-18.2019.49.

Sarma, L.S. (2016) Teaching English through comics. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 6 (6), 283–284. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-ofapplied-research-(IJAR)/fileview/June_2016_1464768478__90.pdf [Accessed 5th May 2022].

Schmitt, N. (1997) Vocabulary learning strategies. In: Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (eds) Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–227.

Tomlinson, B. (1999) Developing criteria for materials evaluation. IATEFL Issues. 147, 10–13.

Tomlinson, B. (2003) Materials Evaluation. In: Tomlinson, B (ed.) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London, Continuum, pp. 15–36.

Unkelbach, C. (2006) The Learned Interpretation of Cognitive Fluency. Psychological Science. 17 (4), 339–345. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x.

Van Lier, L. (1996) Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. London, Longman.

Walqui, A. (2006) Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 9 (2), 159–180. DOI: 10.1080/13670050608668639.