MOTIF OF DOUBLER: ME- AND YOU-DOUBLERS

Ljiljana М. Ćuk

doi:10.21618/fil2123504c

Autor/innen

Ljiljana М. Ćuk University of Novi Sad Faculty of philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2123504c

Schlagworte:

double, replicas, doppelgänger, twins, clone

Abstract

A great deal of concepts are mistakenly classified as doubleness. There are two types of doubles, me-doubles and you-doubles. The first ones are subordinated, the second ones are equal. Me-double is a personification of an autonomous part of an ego which can (but does not have to) be concretised in a new character. They are an artistic superstructure either of a schizophrenic situation or of expressed fears, desires and fantasies. You-doubles are two physically identical characters who exchange their roles or are in some rivalry relationship. You-doubles can be twins, clones, or understudies. There are various subtypes of doubles, from diabolical to dreamed ones. At least, a double has an integrative mental function.

Literaturhinweise

Brugger, Peter (2013), „Autoscopic Phenomena”, Encyclopedia of the Mind I (Ed. Harold E. Pashler), San Diego: University of California, Department of Psychology.

Dimić, Milan V. (1966), „Dvojnik – reč i pojam”, Filološki pregled, Naučno delo, IV, br. 4, 97–120.

Faurholt, Gry (2009), „Approaching Otherness: Self as Other – The Doppelgänger”. Double dialogues, 10, 1–5.

Fonseca, Tony (2007), „The Doppelgänger”, Icons of Horror and the Supernatural – An Encyclopaedia of Our Worst Nightmares 1 (Ed. S. T. Joshi), Connecticut: Greenwood Icons; London: Greenwood Press.

Freud, Sigmund (1955; [ Jerotić, Vladeta (1983), „Dvojnik Dostojevskog i težnja ka moći”, Gradac, god. 10, br. 51/52, 77–81.

Jovanović, Bojan (1983), „Dvojnik u svetu magijske realnosti”, Gradac, god. 10, br. 51/52, 87–92.

Kandić, Dragana (1983), „Dvojnik i njegove metamorfoze”, Gradac, god. 10, br. 51/52, 82–86.

Krstić, Dragan (1996), Psihološki rečnik, Beograd: Savremena administracija.

Marinković, Antonije (1983), „Dvojnik u svetskoj književnosti”, Gradac, god. 10, br. 51/52, 68–76.

McGuire, William (Ed.) (1974), The Correspondence between Sigmund Freud and C. G. Jung (1906–1914), New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Meyer, Priscilla and Jeﬀ Hoﬀman (1997), „Infinite Reﬂections in Pale Fire: The Danish Connection (Hans Andersen and Isak Dinesen)”, Russian Literature, XLI, 191–221.

Miller, Karl (1987), Doubles: Studies of Literary History, Oxford University Press.

Nojman, Erih (1994), Istorijsko poreklo svesti, Beograd: Prosveta.

Progoﬀ, Ira (1973), The death and rebirth of psychology; an integrative evaluation of Freud, Adler, Jung, and Rank and the impact of their culminating insights on modern man, New York: Julian Press.

Rank, Otto (1979), The Double a Psychoanalytic Study, New York: New American Library.

Stevens, Anthony (1998), Freud & Jung: A dual introduction, New York: Barnes & Noble Books.

Todorov, Cvetan (2010), Uvod u fantastičnu književnost. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Trebješanin, Žarko (2008), Rečnik psihologije, Beograd: Stubovi kulture.

Webber, Andrew J. (1996), The doppelgänger: double visions in German literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Živković, Milica (2000), „The Double as the ‛Unseen’ of Culture: Toward a Definition of Doppelganger”, Facta universitatis (Series: Linguistics and Literature), Vol. 2, No 7, 121–128.