THEORY OF PRACTICE AND A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TASK DESIGN IN UNIVERSITY CLIL TEACHING – AN EXAMPLE OF GEOMYTHOLOGY

Authors

  • Lidija V. Beko University of Belgrade Faculty of Mining and Geology
  • Dragoslava N. Mićović University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies in Belgrade Department of Criminalistics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2225203b

Keywords:

CLIL, theory of practice, teacher-researcher, geomitology, communicative skills

Abstract

Challenging the established practice and canons has never been an easy task, i. e. ”a walk in the park”. This paper attempts to provide reasons for believing that the complexity of the CLIL method requires a new type of teacher focused on scientific research, recording and monitoring of their practice. Teachers-researchers, in the spirit of the new era of knowledge, especially when it comes to university teaching or transformative teaching, promote the improvement of contextual language education based on a true understanding of all kinds of academic specificities. Appropriate theory of practice, in order to be useful and applicable, must be pragmatic and tailored to the specific needs of a particular classroom. The theory of practice, intended for CLIL lecturers working in certain unexplored circumstances, is additionally demanding because it expects teachers to improve their practice and often create their own teaching materials, which are missing and which do not seem to appear on the market soon. The teacher-researcher, in that sense, should first examine, describe, evaluate and improve his practice, going into the depth of understanding the linguistic contextual situation and the complex concept of teaching such as CLIL. If teachers, as the backbone of the teaching process, do not engage in the right measure and in the right way in creating their own teaching identity, there is a possibility that they will not succeed when it comes to creating the identity of their students either. This means elucidating all the elements of small and large culture, as well as elucidating and creating new forms of communication and discursive forms that the new language practice spontaneously imposes. Introducing myth into teaching practice is an attempt to create wider possibilities of the teaching process through myth, so that myth, as a rich pedagogical resource, will be used to develop critical spirit, improve learning in the field of major studies and form patterns of tolerant and quality communicative competence. The assumption that this is an ambitious task and that it implies additional time efforts was not left out. However, the dominant intention was that the new teaching materials contribute to the creation of the student’s expertise and personality, and that each segment of the work leads to a higher level of knowledge, communicative skills and cultural understanding. The research confirmed the interest, activation and positive attitudes of students who see myths as more modern and flexible forms of teaching. Students showed a willingness to cooperate, talk, debate in an area they know very little about and in a way, they have never learned a language. Taking into account all the results we have obtained, we unequivocally conclude that the initial research needs additional, subsequent consideration, in order to obtain an even higher level of quality in teaching and language application.

References

Allwright, Dick, & Kathleen M. Bailey (1991), Focus on the Language Classroom: An Introduction to Classroom Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Allwright, Richard L. (2000), Exploratory practice: „An appropriate methodology” for language teacher development?. Paper presented at the 8th IALS Symposium for Language Teacher Educators, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Allwright, Richard L. (2003), Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7, pp. 113–141.

Bentor, Yaakov Kurt (1989), Geological events in the Bible. Terra Nova, 1, 326–228.

Block, David, & Deborah Cameron (2002), Globalization and language teaching. London and New York: Routledge.

Breen, Michael P. (1987), Learner contributions to task design. In: C. N. Candlin, Christopher N. & Dermot F. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 23–46). London: Prentice Hall.

Brumft, Christopher J. (1984), Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bygate, Martin, Peter Skehan & Merrill Swain (2001), Researching pedagogic tasks in second language learning, teaching, and testing. New York: Pearson Education.

Diamond, Susan (1993), Language Lessons in the Classroom. ECL Publications.

Ellis, Rod (2003), Tasked-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Gardner, David, & Lindsay Miller (1996), Tasks for independent language learning. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Geomythology. Mayor, Adrienne in Enclopedia of Geology, ed. Richard Selley, Robin Cocks, and Ian Palmer. Elsevier, fall 2004. Dostupno na: https://web.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/MayorGeomythology.pdf

Guidоboni, Emanuela (1989), I terremoti prima del Mille in Italia e nell'area mediterranea. ING-SGA, Bologna.

Haviland, William A. (1975), Cultural Anthropology. New York: Rhinehart & Winston.

Holliday, Adrian (2012), Small cultures. Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, Keith (2003), Designing a language teaching task. London: Palgrave.

Kramsch, Claire (1993), Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kumaravadivelu, Bala (1993), Te name of the task and the task of naming: Methodological aspects of task-based pedagogy. In: Crookes, Graham, & Susan M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Leech, Geoffrey, & Jan Svartvik (1979), A communicative grammar of English. London: Longman.

Littlewood, William (1981), Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.

Ludwin, Ruth S., Robert Dennis, Deborah Carver, Alan D. McMillan, Robert Losey, John Clague, Chris Jonientz-Trisler, Janine Boweshop, Jacilee Wray, and Karen James (2005), Dating the 1700 Cascadia earthquake: Great coastal earthquakes in Native Stories. Seismological Research Letters, 76, 140–148.

Mayor, Adrienne (2004), Adrienne Mayor in Enclopedia of Geology, ed. Richard Selley, Robin Cocks, and Ian Palmer. Forthcoming, Elsevier, fall 2004.

Nunan, David (1989), Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, David (2004), Tasked-based language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Nur, Amos (1991), Earthquakes in the Bible. New Scientist, 1776, 45–48.

O’Hanlon, Christine (1993), Te importance of an articulated personal theory of professional development. In: Elliott, John (Ed.), Reconstructing teacher education: Teacher development. London: Falmer Press. Oxford, R.

Piccardi, Luigi (2004), The rediscovery of Lernean Hydra’s immortal head. Studi Geologici Camerati, Nuova Serie, 2, 131–139.

Piccardi, Luigi (2005), Paleo seismic evidence of legendary earthquakes: the apparition of Archangel Michael at Monte Sant’ Angelo (Italy). Tectono-physics, 408, 113–128.

Piccardi, Luigi, & Bruce W. Masse (2007), Myth and Geology. London: The Geological Society: 10.

Ryan, William B. F. (2004), The Black Sea flood: a seed for myth? Paper 183–3 presented at the 32nd International Geological Congress, Florence, Italy.

Ryan, William B. F. & Walter C. Pitman III (2000), Noah’s Flood: The New Scientific Theories about the Event that Changed History. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Savignon, Sandra J. (1983), Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

Science, Vol. 310, Issue 5749, November 4, 2005

Tanner, Rosie, & Catherine Green (1998), Tasks for teacher education. London: Longman.

Vitaliano, Dorothy B. (1973) Legends of the Earth. Their Geologic Origins. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Vogt, Jay (1991), Some glimpses at historic seismology. Tectonophysics, 193, 1–7.

Wajnryb, Ruth (1992), Classroom observation tasks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge.

Weir, Cyril J. (1990), Communicative language testing. New York: Prentice Hall.

Widowson, Henry G. (1990), Aspects of language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Willis, Jane (1996), A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.

Yalden, Janice (1983). The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design and implementation. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

V. Beko, L. ., & N. Mićović, D. . (2022). THEORY OF PRACTICE AND A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TASK DESIGN IN UNIVERSITY CLIL TEACHING – AN EXAMPLE OF GEOMYTHOLOGY. PHILOLOGIST – Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies, 13(25), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2225203b